Tip Bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Traditional Sheath

tip Bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Traditional Sheath
tip Bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Traditional Sheath

Tip Bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Traditional Sheath The ureteral access sheath (uas) serves as a supplementary tool, facilitating direct kidney access during rirs. high quality of evidence comparing tip bendable suction ureteral access sheath (s uas) with traditional uas in rirs for the treatment of renal and ureteral stones is lacking. High quality of evidence comparing tip bendable suction ureteral access sheath (s uas) with traditional uas in rirs for the treatment of renal and ureteral stones is lacking. the purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of s uas with traditional uas in rirs for the treatment of renal or ureteral stones ≤30 mm.

tip Bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Traditional Sheath
tip Bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Traditional Sheath

Tip Bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Traditional Sheath Ntfs uas novel tip flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath, t uas traditional ureteral access sheath, sd standard deviation, sfr stone free rates discussion rirs is a minimally invasive procedure that has gained worldwide popularity for treating renal calculi, owing to its improved techniques and novel surgical instruments [ 16 ]. Introduction during the last decades, the advent of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy has revolutionized the management of upper urinary tract stones. we designed a patented tip bendable ureteral access sheath to facilitate stone clearance. our current study reported our initial experience of 224 cases. materials and methods the study is a descriptive, retrospective analysis. the initial 224. Objectives to compare the safety and efficacy of novel tip flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath (ntfs uas) and traditional ureteral access sheath (t uas) combined with flexible ureteroscope for treating unilateral renal calculi. materials and methods the clinical data of 214 patients with unilateral renal calculi treated by ntfs uas (n = 102) and t uas (n = 112) combined with flexible. Purpose: to compare the efficiency and safety of suctioning ureteral access sheath (uas) and traditional uas during flexible ureteroscopy (furs) for treatment of renal stones. methods: between january 2015 and december 2017, 165 patients who had renal stones successfully underwent furs with suctioning uas created by connecting a channel on the tail of the suctioning uas to a vacuum device.

Comments are closed.