105mm Howitzer Shell Vs T 34 Armor Penetration Simulation Youtube Test of the high explosive shell against high hardness armor on the example of the t 34 turret and the high explosive 105mm m1 shell (2.2kg tnt). High explosive squash head munitions spread out on contact with a plate before detonating the angle of the plate will have an effect on how the round deform.
T 34 High Hardness Armor Penetration Simulation Youtube Armor penetration calculator using de marre's equation. Yes, but the theory is to make a top attack weapon which has a better chance to penetrate top armor. an rpg 7 is ~85mm, the rpg 29 is 105mm, and the 29 can definitely go through rear armor, even potentially a side hit. a top attack missile has about the same penetration as a rear hit. reply reply. smokeyunicycle. Test plates were placed at an angle of 60 degrees from horizontal. unless otherwise stated, the assumed impact angle is 60 degrees from horizontal. the quality of the armor plates used to test ammunition would not always match real world conditions. penetration numbers were not based solely on actual firing tests. Strictly technically speaking yes, a 105 mm at the right spot can do lasting damage to many mbts especially outside the frontal armor array, or if it strikes more sensitive equipment like the gun tube optics etc. more practically speaking, the 105 mm cannot damage more modern mbts reliably enough under combat circumstances for it to matter.
Panzer Iii Vs T 34 Pzgr 39 Armor Penetration Simulation Youtube Test plates were placed at an angle of 60 degrees from horizontal. unless otherwise stated, the assumed impact angle is 60 degrees from horizontal. the quality of the armor plates used to test ammunition would not always match real world conditions. penetration numbers were not based solely on actual firing tests. Strictly technically speaking yes, a 105 mm at the right spot can do lasting damage to many mbts especially outside the frontal armor array, or if it strikes more sensitive equipment like the gun tube optics etc. more practically speaking, the 105 mm cannot damage more modern mbts reliably enough under combat circumstances for it to matter. T shell penetration the maximum plate thickness that the shell can penetrate; k de marre's constant a dimensionless constant that varies from shell to shell. for soviet shells it is ~2400, while for other nations it is usually ~2000; n thickness exponent a dimensionless constant that affects the shell's performance against angled armor. The family of 105mm light howitzers (m1, m2, m2a1, m101, m102, and m119) traces its history from 1928. the m2a1 was first produced in 1940 and was renamed the m101 after world war ii.
T 34 Vs T29 Side Armor Penetration Test Youtube T shell penetration the maximum plate thickness that the shell can penetrate; k de marre's constant a dimensionless constant that varies from shell to shell. for soviet shells it is ~2400, while for other nations it is usually ~2000; n thickness exponent a dimensionless constant that affects the shell's performance against angled armor. The family of 105mm light howitzers (m1, m2, m2a1, m101, m102, and m119) traces its history from 1928. the m2a1 was first produced in 1940 and was renamed the m101 after world war ii.
T 34 85 Vs Tiger Ii Br 365p Apcr Armor Penetration Simulation Yo
Comments are closed.